by AFL
CATEGORIES

 Military  
 Current events  
 Religion 
 Technology 
 Countries 
 Politics 
 Society 
 Other 






There are currently no top
rated posts : don't forget you can "thumb" up or down posts.

Website intro. Please login or register (it's very fast and free).



  • Index
  • » Techology - Room 1
  • » M 16 vs ak 47 by america
  •    the m16 accurate low recoil and when you shoot you dont spray all over like the ak 47

    m 16 because you can actualy shoot someone

    Edit

#1 2013-06-14 11:20:19

          Denmark    jacktimo
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




AK47 rifle is the world's best-selling, but also the most expensive, high cost, adaptability is very good. M16 in desert areas as AK handy.


______________________________________________________________
WOW Gold|Wow Gold Kaufen|GW2 Gold|FIFA 13 Coins

Offline

#2 2013-04-24 03:15:41

          United States    TAHolt-US
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




The ak-47 outdid the m16 in the wars fought with these two weapons.

Though the m16's title is being fitted on adaptions of the original, the original ak-47 model is more or less in need to be retired, but variations of it should live on till bullets become irrelevant hump

Offline

#3 2013-03-02 04:54:02

          Belarus    Lenin
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




the first m-16 and first ak-47 both were terrible unreliable weapons, if you mean the new versions, than definately the kalashnikov wins here

Offline

#4 2012-07-12 11:53:54

          South Africa    Spirovsky
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




AK47, cheap, effective, reliable.

Offline

#5 2011-11-06 05:54:53

          Canada    SgtPeppers
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@NikoLStak 

the only issue I find myself agreeing with conservatives on is the death penalty, although I think the cost is to high to justify its use.

The fact is, liberal policies make sense, I can take a calculator and prove their economics, I can see the stats justifying their social policy, I can agree with their secularism, they just don't seem to get it wrong.

Offline

#6 2011-11-05 18:15:38

          Russia    NikoLStak
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@SgtPeppers 

"Liberals do not put TVs in prison"

It was an exemple. But efforts are done and money is spent for prisonners that don't even want and/or deserve it.


Well the Gulag was a pretty good idea for Capital Punishment. But someone decided to use them as a political punishment... It's gainful for the governement and disuasive.


I didn't knew that Moderate was a true type of politic Lol.
What I meant by Moderate is that none of Liberalism or Conservatism is in symbiosis with my thinking. There is equal number of things in both that I hate and like. Voting for any of them would make me spew.

Offline

#7 2011-11-04 23:59:12

          Canada    SgtPeppers
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@NikoLStak 

I agree with the sentiments but not the conclusion, Liberals (speaking from my knowledge) do not put TVs in prison, in fact liberals and conservatives both seem to agree in regards to murder, rape and other similar crimes, the main reason we stopped killing them was that the appeals cost more than letting them rot. Where they differ is on petty crimes like drug possession, where liberals want to educate band rehabilitate rather than condemning them to a life of crime, while conservatives just want to lock them up.

I have a special disdain for moderates, because in most cases they are simply politicians pandering to the centre rather than actual belief. No moderate government ever accomplishes anything because they fear necessary radical change to fix things. Partisan politicians like Layton or Trudeau have passion, which is one of the most important attributes in a leader.

Offline



   

#8 2011-11-04 17:40:39

          Russia    NikoLStak
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@SgtPeppers 

I prefer a modarate governement that make progressing the nation by doing what is need to be done.

The thing I hate in the Liberals is their idealist thinking. In the Conservative, I hate their stupid thinking that stop the progress of the world.
I will take the exemple of the prisoners.

Liberal : Giving TVs and spending billions to make their time in prison the most fun possible. Being so obsess with humans rights that some murderer don't even deserve. Defending the persons who raped your daugther before beating her to death and forcing you to pay more tax to pay the TV and the electicity for this animal. Totally refusing Capital Punishement.

Conservative : Sending the prisonners to the Hole without any precaution and relase them in the street after. Refusing to spend money to educate these asshole and change them into benefits for the society(At least something positive will be out of their crime).
Want all the murderers to be executed.

Offline

#9 2011-11-04 15:46:50

          Canada    SgtPeppers
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@NikoLStak 

Looking at your last point, that is true for America, but no one would claim liberals have, to use you term, no balls if they had heard Jack Layton speak in Canada, the great tragedy is that we lost him, but his party, the NDP, still have a lot more guts than the Harper Conservatives.

AK47 is a lot more durable, but s a little more sporadic in the aiming, so the question of which gun is better involves whether your ammunition is limited.

Offline

#10 2011-10-30 22:13:05

          Russia    NikoLStak
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




If the price has no matter, M16 is better.
Ak-47 has the best quality/price report.


And about your debate about Liberal and Conservative, it's simple.

One has no balls, the other has no brain.

Offline

#11 2011-10-07 00:40:47

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Sorry, that's just what I see in schools these days. Thank goodness I'm not in public schools.

The Expert.

Offline

#12 2011-10-03 13:50:26

          United States    Snow_Dog
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




I have listened to him, I've met Karl Rove, heard him speak. I make an effort to learn the other side's views. I studied Ayn Rand for fun over the summer. I know a lot of your views, so I have a basis for my critiques. I've listened to your side, and can honestly say it makes no sense to me in terms of social beliefs. Economic beliefs on the other hand, I can understand the idea of controlled spending. I'm a person who likes conservative spending and liberal taxation. I believe or spending is misdirected though. (as in, less money for defense and social security, more money for infrastructure and education). Don't assume that I'm brainwashed.

Offline

#13 2011-09-29 17:02:20

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




There's someone you need to listen to. Before you dismiss him or me as a homophobic maniac or whatever you liberals call him, just listen to him and see if he makes sense.
So tune into the EIB network, and listen to Rush Limbaugh.

The Expert.

Offline

#14 2011-09-29 13:17:02

          United States    Snow_Dog
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Because, I don't trust government as it currently is. I believe in balancing conservative economics with liberal social and taxation values. I want to balance socialism with capitalism. I'm party line liberal only in social values.

Offline

#15 2011-09-29 02:18:18

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Midwest, huh? And we conservatives are crazy, huh? I was going to go off on a tirade ... But wait, you say you aren't a party line liberal? Why not?

The Expert.

Offline

#16 2011-09-28 18:51:26

          United States    Snow_Dog
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




I come from the Midwest, don't think I don't know what crazy conservatives think of my views. I don't care. I'm liberal, but I'm not party line, just because I believe in a lot of the same ideals, doesn't mean I follow every single belief. I believe in gun control, and if I could I'd outlaw all hand guns and assault weapons for civilian use, but I understand the need for hunting rifles and military weapons. I understand the need, but I don't support it. I also understand how it's unrealistic to think that banning guns would stop crime, it would cut the rate and put a stop to many accidental deaths, but criminals who want guns will find a way no matter what. I'm asking why we should be talking about these things (the M-16 and AK-47, meant strictly to kill people) as if they were sports objects, things to compare stats with. We forget that those stats are based around death.

Offline

#17 2011-08-31 19:10:01

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Yes, I admit to getting caught up earlier,
and that is my fault. But I'm going to try
to stay on subject now.

The Expert.

Offline

#18 2011-08-31 19:02:25

          United Kingdom    depresser
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@The Expert Again, I say you did not mind getting off topic earlier.

The Expert of all experts. In fact I am so experty that I... think I should go write a blog about it.

Offline

#19 2011-08-31 18:52:24

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




I'm not trying to change anything,but we are getting off topic. This is about whether the M16 or the AK47 is better, not the crime rate
of the UK as opposed to that of America.

The Expert.

Offline

#20 2011-08-31 18:49:43

          United Kingdom    depresser
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@The Expert You change the topic when you lose an argument. You seemed perfectly willing to argue earlier. What changed?

Oh wait......

Offline

Board footer

Created by AFL, powered by FluxBB
© 2011 theworlddebating.com