by AFL
CATEGORIES

 Military  
 Current events  
 Religion 
 Technology 
 Countries 
 Politics 
 Society 
 Other 






There are currently no top
rated posts : don't forget you can "thumb" up or down posts.

Website intro. Please login or register (it's very fast and free).



  • Index
  • » Techology - Room 1
  • » M 16 vs ak 47 by america
  •    the m16 accurate low recoil and when you shoot you dont spray all over like the ak 47

    m 16 because you can actualy shoot someone

    Edit

#21 2011-08-31 18:46:02

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Okay, we're getting off topic, not here. I'm planning to open a thread on gun control sometime in the near future.

The M14 is the best.

The Expert.

By the way, the root of the problem is that not
enough people are carrying guns.

Last edited by The Expert (2011-08-31 18:48:07)

Offline

#22 2011-08-31 18:38:13

          United Kingdom    depresser
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@The Expert in 2010 only 619 people were murdered in England and Wales. About 60 million people live in England and Wales.
In 2006 17,034 People were murdered in America, which has a population of about 6 times that of the UK. A far higher murder rate.
Per 100 000 people in the UK, 1.4 are murdered.
Per 100 000 people in the US 5.4 are murdered
This means you are almost four times more likely to be murdered in the US than in the UK.
In large US cities, per 100 00 people, 12.1 are killed.

Around 90% of homicides in the US are Gun Crimes.

Try to dispute this however it may prove impossible. This is unaltered fact.

The Real Expert

Offline

#23 2011-08-31 01:30:55

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@depresser, God, far lower crime rate? Significantly better murder rate? Are you joking? I'm laughing my head off right now! Oh, wait, that because you don't go after criminals there. Yep,
you won't catch me vacationing in the
nanny state any time soon. On a more serious note,
Gun control laws are the root of the problem, ie, New York.

The Expert.

Offline

#24 2011-08-30 22:45:25

          United Kingdom    depresser
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@The Expert Britain has a far lower rate of crime in comparison to the US under normal circumstances and a significantly better murder rate. The US is the most dangerous rich western country in the world, yet is the most rich. Most social economists label gun laws in america as the cause of this.

Offline

#25 2011-08-30 16:20:27

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@depresser, It's fascinating to analyze what the
human mind can come up with. The mechanics
are fascinating to look  at and imagine how they work.
And you being in crime ridden Britain with strict gun
control laws, I doubt you can understand that.

The Expert.

And yeah, it would be a better place, but the human
nature ain't gonna allow that! Look outside, look at
the world.

Last edited by The Expert (2011-08-30 16:21:54)

Offline

#26 2011-08-29 21:43:45

          United Kingdom    depresser
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@The Expert The world would be a better place without guns, war and over inflated militaries. i do not understand why you love this stuff so much, thinking they are good things.

The more effective weapon is the M-16 if you are asking.

Offline

#27 2011-08-29 21:10:05

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Oh, sorry, I don't know where your from,
but "liberal" is used as a bit of a insult here.
And honestly there isn't much point to this
debate other than it's interesting to analyze
technology, sorry if you don't feel the same.
And your actually advocating weapons for
self defense? I thought that was against
liberal policies of gun control.

The Expert.

Offline



   

#28 2011-08-29 17:24:34

          United States    Snow_Dog
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@The Expert Boohoo, I don't like things that have killed millions of people, too bad. What purpose other than military and crime use does either gun serve? You need to accept that some people don't like guns, and get the hell over it. I'm liberal, so what? I don't know any other purpose the AK 47 or M-16 serves other than a weapon of murder. Please, inform me of practical uses of these machines. They're no good for hunting really, and a handgun would do fine for self defense, so why need assault weapons?

Last edited by Snow_Dog (2011-08-29 17:29:44)

Offline

#29 2011-08-28 20:18:51

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@Snow_Dog, Shut up, it doesn't concern you, liberal. And some of us do care!

Offline

#30 2011-07-19 12:22:05

          United States    Rashid
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




AK-47 because it actually fires when you pull the trigger.

Offline

#31 2011-07-15 17:22:10

          United States    G34
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




If my choices are M16 or AK 47 I pick a 12 ga. Preferably a 590A1 or an 870P but anything pump action in a pinch.

Offline

#32 2011-07-01 00:00:26

          United States    Gishkiman
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Ak 47. Much more reliable, fairly accurate despite its reputation (M16 has it beat in accuracy), but also extremely easy to use, while the M16 requires some amount of military training. Take rebel fighters around the world as an example, men with absolutely no military training, using the Ak 47 with suprisingly good (for them) results.

Offline

#33 2011-05-17 23:29:46

          United States    The Expert
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




The AK-47 isn't a wheelbarrow or a Rolls Royce, its designed to work.
It's easy to produce, and you can train anyone with it. perfect for
a conscript army like Russia. The M-16 on the other hand...
It was adopted for political reasons. I'm not a fan of the AK-47
if it may appear  so, but the M-16 is not my first choice of a weapon.
If I had my way, they would keep using the M14.

The Expert.

Offline

#34 2011-05-10 21:08:42

          United States    Snow_Dog
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




Why would we care?

Offline

#35 2011-04-28 17:09:41

          United States    america
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




this happend in liybea this is the ak 47u   

Offline

#36 2011-04-21 12:11:13

          United States    Reaper007
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




7.62x39mm is a big bullet.It has a lot of stopping power but what makes the bullet bad to use is the AK.Since the AK has a lot of recoil and has very bad accuracy,it takes a lot of shots to hit the target(depending what's the range).5.56x45mm is a smaller round.It has a bit more penetration then the 39mm.Not a lot of stopping power but the gun makes it great,the M16.I don't like the original,it jammed a lot in Vietnam.Has a little bit of recoil so it makes the gun really accurate,so it makes it easier to hit the target.M16A1 is my favorite.M16 wins this.

Offline

#37 2011-04-20 17:56:38

          United States    Reyo
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




AK47 over the Original M16. but the M16A2 over the AK47. I think the changes made a huge difference. the AK47 is just a tad bit too inaccurate and the sights are not very useful for anything farther then 100meters

Offline

#38 2011-04-19 22:38:40

          United States    america
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@antonov it may be the most popular but not the best

Offline

#39 2011-04-19 21:03:10

          United States    america
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




the original m16 and ak47

Offline

#40 2011-04-18 22:35:18

          France    fra2591
               Reply
   0    

Re: M 16 vs ak 47




@Jpreisser no I guess we're talking about the original versions.

Offline

Board footer

Created by AFL, powered by FluxBB
© 2011 theworlddebating.com