Microsoft vs Apple vs Other by depresser

Archduke · 2014-07-25 02:17:10

Windows is easier to use but it's changing for change's sake and it can drive people mad having to let your bucks flow to keep up with the Hendersons....

meloano · 2013-09-10 05:15:06

Have used both. I owned a mac some years ago and then switched to windows. And now i have an iPad and windows PC till date. Windows PC is easy to use. And for videos and fun I found iPad best. For me both are OK.

calibur · 2012-09-20 04:21:15

I have a pc and an iPod, so sue me.

meapinetree · 2012-09-19 22:20:41

windows= supreme over all

irishgenius · 2012-07-27 16:51:41

I prefer Windows because its simple to use.

calibur · 2012-07-20 19:10:37

@hans2707

Yeah, but you have to be a professional government hacker to use it.

Come on, we had hidden this for so long!

hans2707 · 2012-07-20 13:51:54

linux is surethe winner because it's free and there are almost no virusses and tons of distro's to choose from

andresvk · 2012-07-10 00:22:17

Please, this is a TECH debate. Feel free to discuss the tax distribution and fairness of capitalism, but do it in another thread!

SgtPeppers · 2011-10-13 21:05:15

@TheAmerican

Your idea is ludicrous, no matter what the tax rate people will still want to be billionaires, because a billionaire taxed at 99% is still richer than several millionaires combined.

The fact is many of the super rich actually say they should be paying more taxes, Mark Cuban, Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, to name a few.

Last edited by SgtPeppers (2011-10-13 21:11:06)

TheAmerican · 2011-10-07 23:54:51

I beg your pardon?

Linc · 2011-10-07 19:32:30

Bite me hump .

TheAmerican · 2011-10-06 21:51:47

Is it? Have your pick. Laconic, cynic, ironic, There's quite a variety. TA.

TheAmerican · 2011-10-06 21:40:34

You, Sir, are wrong in regard to the taxes. Or at least in America the tax rate is much higher. Why does that person care? It's because they earned it, they didn't steal it, they earned it. Something you liberals can't grasp. The problem with it (higher taxes) is that it remove incentive to work hard, to strive, to innovate, and to excel. Remove those, and a free market economy will soar. But if you give hand-outs to large companies such as GM, you remove that incentive. Companies that are going down hill should be allowed to fizzle out. Understand? TheAmerican.

sex_beast91 · 2011-10-06 04:48:39

RIP STEVE JOBS

SgtPeppers · 2011-10-06 00:55:27

@TheAmerican

Actually, the super rich account for only 26 percent, and yet if you raised the taxes on them 1 percent, in 10 years you would make 700 billion dollars, to get that same amount from the bottom 50 percent, you would have to take half of everything they own, including property, money and whatever other sources of capital they possess.

Why does someone earning 100 million a year care if you take 40 million, that still leaves them with more money than any reasonable person would need in a lifetime, all for 1 years work.

For the debate question, this macbook is faster than any windows computer of equal cost would be, the cheaper laptops and computers are near useless unless you upgrade the graphics, computer speed and virtually everything else, by which point the mac would be cheaper and still less prone to crashing (I know from experience)

Last edited by SgtPeppers (2011-10-06 01:00:18)

Linc · 2011-10-05 22:29:51

@TheAmerican Is this ironic or not? I don't get it

TheAmerican · 2011-10-05 18:26:00

Yeah, since the rich already pay more than 90 percent of America's taxes, they should still pay more! diagree

Linc · 2011-10-04 14:21:59

@TheAmerican well I'm a proud conservative republican hum2
They made their money out of hard work and innovation. They diserve their money. However I do believe they should increase very slightly taxes on rich people, but only to make taxes of the same proportions for every american. Socialists are just poor lealous people.

TheAmerican · 2011-10-03 21:10:11

No I'm a proud liberal and socialist. and they should give back!!! what they have stolen!!!
or else hang

Snow_Dog · 2011-10-03 13:53:44

Dream computer, PC's affordability and the ease of upgrading, OS X's stability, and Linux's open source/greatness. Also, Mac's endurance in terms of casing. I have dropped my MacBook on concrete, and I'm still typing on it now, without any severe damage.

#1 2014-07-25 02:17:10

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#2 2013-09-10 05:15:06

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#3 2012-09-20 04:21:15

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#4 2012-09-19 22:20:41

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#5 2012-07-27 16:51:41

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#6 2012-07-20 19:10:37

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#7 2012-07-20 13:51:54

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#8 2012-07-10 00:22:17

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#9 2011-10-13 21:05:15

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#10 2011-10-07 23:54:51

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#11 2011-10-07 19:32:30

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#12 2011-10-06 21:51:47

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#13 2011-10-06 21:40:34

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#14 2011-10-06 04:48:39

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#15 2011-10-06 00:55:27

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#16 2011-10-05 22:29:51

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#17 2011-10-05 18:26:00

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#18 2011-10-04 14:21:59

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#19 2011-10-03 21:10:11

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

#20 2011-10-03 13:53:44

Re: Microsoft vs Apple vs Other

Board footer